A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours over the construction of the wall in a coastal site in the north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household home at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a highly publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, seek out to create their loved ones residence. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. Based on the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted below setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, each people of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Spot of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal ecosystem like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, which can be partly designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action being an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can protect their see, an allegation that's been repeated in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal organizing disputes, exactly where sights of The ocean are both equally very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described extraordinary initiatives through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded via ocean in storm to photograph the location, In accordance with sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-higher water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions, a picture which has because come to be emblematic of your depth with the dispute. These actions were not basically symbolic; they were being meant to Collect visual proof in the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times claimed, describing how The 2 Adult males entered the water all through intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the positioning grew to become Just about the most hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely observed that such steps ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into a location impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined in detail by the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as audience sought to grasp the track record and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court read even more submissions on whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt design pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key moment while in the lawful timeline.
At the core of the dispute can be a disagreement around boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as created, goes further than what was accepted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, continues to be called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing files, maps, and problems attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by problem for environmental defense and adherence to scheduling regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A personal perspective, insisting rather that it is about guaranteeing that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limits. In affidavits, they've explained their prolonged-standing link to the realm and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a few basically looking to make a loved ones home in accordance While using the law. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Distinctive Space of Conservation and say that all functions are already completed depending on Specialist assistance and permitted options. Their lawyers have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into the sea for the duration of a storm, will not change the underlying info.
The case has also elevated broader questions on how setting up disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute in excess of building of wall at coastal site has grown to be a shorthand description for any condition that lots of observers see as more and more common. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation involving non-public land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become additional contentious.
The Irish Times post about René Collier noted that the businessman had previously been involved in local advocacy on planning and environmental concerns, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Situations posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from extremely unique Qualified backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning within the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by midsection-superior drinking water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of waistline-large water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times are phrases that appeared repeatedly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical actuality with the coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an extreme approach.
As being the High Court proceedings proceed, the outcome remains uncertain. The court docket should ascertain whether the wall as created complies with preparing permission and whether any encroachment into a Specific Space of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and scheduling disorders. However the human aspect continues to be central: neighbours who need to Are living along with one another extensive after the lawful prices are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design operates at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, though the implications of the case increase past that handle. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the importance of clarity in organizing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. In addition, it underscores how speedily a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when elementary troubles for instance environmental protection and Irish Times article about René Collier house rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a location of natural elegance and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal questions. No matter whether it will eventually finally be altered, taken off, or done as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will very likely continue to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent years.